01
Why I built it
Diagnostic agreement can vary by diagnosis, assessment method, and clinical context. Clinicians examine competing explanations, missing evidence, and medical or substance contributors before forming a clinical formulation.
I built Diagnoxal to provide a structured alternative view before the clinician reaches a final judgment. The site includes educational material and blog posts about clinical reasoning.
02
What it does
Examine another view
Clinicians enter a case with identifying details removed. Diagnoxal organizes the evidence, lists alternate possibilities and missing information, and poses questions for further assessment.
Learn clinical reasoning
Case studies, error-identification exercises, flashcards, quizzes, blog posts, and practice material let clinicians practice differential reasoning.
Follow a case
Clinicians add follow-up information and update the review as they learn more about the case.
03
How it is built
- Web application
- The browser interface connects to a Python service that processes cases in the background.
- Reports, export, and learning
- The product presents structured reports, export options, and educational material for clinical reasoning.
04
Important to know
Diagnoxal provides clinical reasoning and educational support. Clinicians remain responsible for the diagnosis, clinical interview, and professional judgment.
The review reflects the supplied information. A complete assessment and relevant clinical data are required to resolve remaining uncertainty.